This chapter assesses the effectiveness of the Everything But Arms (EBA) initiative launched by the European Union (EU) in 2001. It evaluates whether EBA has been effective in increasing exports from Least Developed Countries (LDC) to the EU, over the period 1995–2006. After arguing that the impact of trade preferences should be estimated by using disaggregated trade flows rather than aggregated trade, the analysis is carried out by considering five products (cloves, coffee, crustaceans, molluscs and vanilla beans) which meet three criteria relating to the export intensity of LDC, the actual preferences of EBA and the intra-year distribution of EU tariffs. The export share of the 5-selected goods with respect to national exports is never marginal and, in many cases, is higher than 60%. From an econometric perspective, we improve the reliability of results by giving great attention to the econometric setting and to measurement of the preferential treatment. The evidence differs from one product to another and this supports the decision to work using disaggregated data because it allows us to gauge the sector specificities which would be hidden when analysing total trade.

Analysing the Impact of Everything But Arms Initiative Using a Gravity Model

AIELLO, Francesco
;
CARDAMONE, Paola
2011-01-01

Abstract

This chapter assesses the effectiveness of the Everything But Arms (EBA) initiative launched by the European Union (EU) in 2001. It evaluates whether EBA has been effective in increasing exports from Least Developed Countries (LDC) to the EU, over the period 1995–2006. After arguing that the impact of trade preferences should be estimated by using disaggregated trade flows rather than aggregated trade, the analysis is carried out by considering five products (cloves, coffee, crustaceans, molluscs and vanilla beans) which meet three criteria relating to the export intensity of LDC, the actual preferences of EBA and the intra-year distribution of EU tariffs. The export share of the 5-selected goods with respect to national exports is never marginal and, in many cases, is higher than 60%. From an econometric perspective, we improve the reliability of results by giving great attention to the econometric setting and to measurement of the preferential treatment. The evidence differs from one product to another and this supports the decision to work using disaggregated data because it allows us to gauge the sector specificities which would be hidden when analysing total trade.
2011
978-3-642-16563-4
TRADE PREFERENCES
EBA
Developing Countries
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/169314
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact