Urban planning is related to the definition of the uses of urban areas by public and private operators and governing processes subjected to concerted, commons and continuous trans-formation.An improper land use planning can lead to negative effects from the point of view of so -cio-economic and environmental damages and consequently a urban damage.The “urban damage estimation” or the estimation of the impacts resulting from the imple -mentation of the master plan in terms of temporal projections, it’s really important. Is im-portant to circumvent the negative effects, as it’s difficult in terms of definition of parameters (measures, addresses, criteria, indicators) analysis and verification, because themselves are variables, both from the point of view of quantity and function and at the same time tightly interconnected between them.To limit the negative impacts related to the environmental aspects that characterize the re-gional and urban planning, the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) appears to be the most suitable tool in that its purpose reside, as well as in the preparation of the verification of the expected effects, even in the delineation lines of action to support the monitoring and management of the plan over time (Francini & Palermo, 2013).Within the SEA can, however also include the so-called urban equalization in terms of defini-tion of measures and guidelines for the mitigation of the expected effects.This paper aims to broaden the horizons of the current underlying strategic environmental assessment or simply to support those that most characterize it, increasing the test parameters of the participatory process of the plan and the consequent definition of the strategic line of action of the same.Starting from these assumptions, then you want to focus on the analysis of programmatic evaluation of the effects, to reduce the “harm urban” connected with borning of any adverse effect of phenomena such as conflicts arise for example a failure to ensure the rule of law and fact, considering how new parameter to differentiate between the current state and future state of the application of equalization.
The ‘urban damage’ into the description of the plan’s alternative. Equalization addresses for mitigate the effects
Francini, M;Palermo A;Salvo, F.
2015-01-01
Abstract
Urban planning is related to the definition of the uses of urban areas by public and private operators and governing processes subjected to concerted, commons and continuous trans-formation.An improper land use planning can lead to negative effects from the point of view of so -cio-economic and environmental damages and consequently a urban damage.The “urban damage estimation” or the estimation of the impacts resulting from the imple -mentation of the master plan in terms of temporal projections, it’s really important. Is im-portant to circumvent the negative effects, as it’s difficult in terms of definition of parameters (measures, addresses, criteria, indicators) analysis and verification, because themselves are variables, both from the point of view of quantity and function and at the same time tightly interconnected between them.To limit the negative impacts related to the environmental aspects that characterize the re-gional and urban planning, the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) appears to be the most suitable tool in that its purpose reside, as well as in the preparation of the verification of the expected effects, even in the delineation lines of action to support the monitoring and management of the plan over time (Francini & Palermo, 2013).Within the SEA can, however also include the so-called urban equalization in terms of defini-tion of measures and guidelines for the mitigation of the expected effects.This paper aims to broaden the horizons of the current underlying strategic environmental assessment or simply to support those that most characterize it, increasing the test parameters of the participatory process of the plan and the consequent definition of the strategic line of action of the same.Starting from these assumptions, then you want to focus on the analysis of programmatic evaluation of the effects, to reduce the “harm urban” connected with borning of any adverse effect of phenomena such as conflicts arise for example a failure to ensure the rule of law and fact, considering how new parameter to differentiate between the current state and future state of the application of equalization.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.