This paper presents and discusses the results of a pilot study carried out to validate two English as a Foreign Language (EFL) tests intended to measure implicit and explicit knowledge of the simple past tense (form and meaning). The tests were developed as part of research project which investigates the extent to which immediate electronic corrective feedback (e.g., Heift, 2001, 2004, 2010; Moreno, 2008; Nagata, 1993; Nagata & Swisher 1995; Pujolà, 2001; Rosa & Leow, 2004; Sachs, 2010; Sanz, C., Lin, H. J., Lado, B., Wood Bowden, H., & Stafford, C., 2009; Sanz & Morgan-Short, 2004) given to EFL students carrying out Information and Communication Technology (ICT) based learning activities can affect foreign language development. In particular, the project seeks to understand whether certain types of corrective feedback are more effective than others and whether the effectiveness of corrective feedback might vary depending on the type of task. As this main study will employ a pretest-posttest design with treatment, it was necessary to create and pilot the two tests before they could be used as data collection tools to measure the effects of the treatment provided. The piloting of the tests was therefore carried out in order to validate whether the tests are comparable and understand the extent to which they are suitable for their purpose. This paper begins with a brief outline of the main research project. The core of the paper then reports on the pilot study carried out, focusing in particular on an analysis and critical evaluation of the content of the tests, and provides suggestions on how the tests can be improved in order to guarantee validity and reliability.

Developing and validating EFL items

JIMENEZ, Jean Marguerite
2013-01-01

Abstract

This paper presents and discusses the results of a pilot study carried out to validate two English as a Foreign Language (EFL) tests intended to measure implicit and explicit knowledge of the simple past tense (form and meaning). The tests were developed as part of research project which investigates the extent to which immediate electronic corrective feedback (e.g., Heift, 2001, 2004, 2010; Moreno, 2008; Nagata, 1993; Nagata & Swisher 1995; Pujolà, 2001; Rosa & Leow, 2004; Sachs, 2010; Sanz, C., Lin, H. J., Lado, B., Wood Bowden, H., & Stafford, C., 2009; Sanz & Morgan-Short, 2004) given to EFL students carrying out Information and Communication Technology (ICT) based learning activities can affect foreign language development. In particular, the project seeks to understand whether certain types of corrective feedback are more effective than others and whether the effectiveness of corrective feedback might vary depending on the type of task. As this main study will employ a pretest-posttest design with treatment, it was necessary to create and pilot the two tests before they could be used as data collection tools to measure the effects of the treatment provided. The piloting of the tests was therefore carried out in order to validate whether the tests are comparable and understand the extent to which they are suitable for their purpose. This paper begins with a brief outline of the main research project. The core of the paper then reports on the pilot study carried out, focusing in particular on an analysis and critical evaluation of the content of the tests, and provides suggestions on how the tests can be improved in order to guarantee validity and reliability.
2013
978-88-557-0488-5
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/187403
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact