Querying inconsistent knowledge bases has attracted a great deal of interest over the last decades. Also explainability has recently become a prominent problem in AI, and explaining query answers allows users to understand why a query is entailed. In this paper, we address the problem of explaining ontological query answers in the existential rules setting under three popular inconsistency-tolerant semantics, namely, the ABox repair, the intersection of repairs, and the intersection of closed repairs semantics.
Explanations for Inconsistency-Tolerant Query Answering under Existential Rules
Molinaro C.
2022-01-01
Abstract
Querying inconsistent knowledge bases has attracted a great deal of interest over the last decades. Also explainability has recently become a prominent problem in AI, and explaining query answers allows users to understand why a query is entailed. In this paper, we address the problem of explaining ontological query answers in the existential rules setting under three popular inconsistency-tolerant semantics, namely, the ABox repair, the intersection of repairs, and the intersection of closed repairs semantics.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
