Querying inconsistent knowledge bases has attracted a great deal of interest over the last decades. Also explainability has recently become a prominent problem in AI, and explaining query answers allows users to understand why a query is entailed. In this paper, we address the problem of explaining ontological query answers in the existential rules setting under three popular inconsistency-tolerant semantics, namely, the ABox repair, the intersection of repairs, and the intersection of closed repairs semantics.

Explanations for Inconsistency-Tolerant Query Answering under Existential Rules

Molinaro C.
2022-01-01

Abstract

Querying inconsistent knowledge bases has attracted a great deal of interest over the last decades. Also explainability has recently become a prominent problem in AI, and explaining query answers allows users to understand why a query is entailed. In this paper, we address the problem of explaining ontological query answers in the existential rules setting under three popular inconsistency-tolerant semantics, namely, the ABox repair, the intersection of repairs, and the intersection of closed repairs semantics.
2022
Complexity
Existential rules
Explanations
Inconsistencies
Knowledge representation
Query answering
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/338054
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact