In this work we propose a method to improve the visual assessment of vascular complexity in cine-angiography images from patients affected by peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD); in particular, we aim at evaluating the inter-clinician variability when scoring vascular complexity over "raw" and "processed" cine-angiography videos. The proposed workflow consists of 2 main steps: (i) conversion of the cine-angiographies to single static images with a broader field of view (FOV), and (ii) automatic segmentation of the vascular trees. In order to accomplish steps (i) and (ii) we make use of approaches based on machine-learning and deep-learning, respectively. We assessed the method on 20 cine-angiography acquisitions and asked three experienced interventional cardiologists to visually examine and then score the vascular complexity on cine-angiography (video), static image (grayscale) and segmented image (segmented). The inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed as inter-observer agreement metric and to account for possible systematic error, that depends on the experience of the raters. Absolute agreement was higher over the segmented image (ICC = 0.956) compared to the video (ICC = 0.761) and the grayscale image (ICC = 0.918). The 95% confidence level was statistically in favour of the segmented image; systematic error among raters was found. Results suggest that extracting the vascular tree from cine-angiography can substantially improve the reliability of visual assessment of vascular complexity in PAOD. Next steps will consist of the identification of a quantitative index as complexity score, in order to both speed up the clinical workflow and reduce the subjective error.
Improving the assessment of vascular complexity in peripheral artery occlusive disease
Bruno P.;Calimeri F.;Indolfi C.;De Rosa S.;
2020-01-01
Abstract
In this work we propose a method to improve the visual assessment of vascular complexity in cine-angiography images from patients affected by peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD); in particular, we aim at evaluating the inter-clinician variability when scoring vascular complexity over "raw" and "processed" cine-angiography videos. The proposed workflow consists of 2 main steps: (i) conversion of the cine-angiographies to single static images with a broader field of view (FOV), and (ii) automatic segmentation of the vascular trees. In order to accomplish steps (i) and (ii) we make use of approaches based on machine-learning and deep-learning, respectively. We assessed the method on 20 cine-angiography acquisitions and asked three experienced interventional cardiologists to visually examine and then score the vascular complexity on cine-angiography (video), static image (grayscale) and segmented image (segmented). The inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed as inter-observer agreement metric and to account for possible systematic error, that depends on the experience of the raters. Absolute agreement was higher over the segmented image (ICC = 0.956) compared to the video (ICC = 0.761) and the grayscale image (ICC = 0.918). The 95% confidence level was statistically in favour of the segmented image; systematic error among raters was found. Results suggest that extracting the vascular tree from cine-angiography can substantially improve the reliability of visual assessment of vascular complexity in PAOD. Next steps will consist of the identification of a quantitative index as complexity score, in order to both speed up the clinical workflow and reduce the subjective error.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.