Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
IRIS
The production of charm and beauty quarks in ep interactions has been measured with the ZEUS detector at HERA for squared four-momentum exchange Q(2) > 20 GeV(2), using an integrated luminosity of 126 pb(-1). Charm and beauty quarks were identified through their decays into muons. Differential cross sections were measured for muon transverse momenta p(T)(mu) > 1.5 GeV and pseudorapidities - 1.6 < eta(mu) < 2.3, as a function of p(T)(mu), eta(mu), Q(2) and Bjorken x. The charm and beauty contributions to the proton structure function F(2) were also extracted. The results agree with previous measurements based on independent techniques and are well described by QCD predictions. RI Doyle, Anthony/C-5889-2009; IBRAHIM, ZAINOL ABIDIN/C-1121-2010; Fazio, Salvatore /G-5156-2010; WAN ABDULLAH, WAN AHMAD TAJUDDIN/B-5439-2010; Ferrando, James/A-9192-2012; Gladilin, Leonid/B-5226-2011
The production of charm and beauty quarks in ep interactions has been measured with the ZEUS detector at HERA for squared four-momentum exchange Q(2) > 20 GeV(2), using an integrated luminosity of 126 pb(-1). Charm and beauty quarks were identified through their decays into muons. Differential cross sections were measured for muon transverse momenta p(T)(mu) > 1.5 GeV and pseudorapidities - 1.6 < eta(mu) < 2.3, as a function of p(T)(mu), eta(mu), Q(2) and Bjorken x. The charm and beauty contributions to the proton structure function F(2) were also extracted. The results agree with previous measurements based on independent techniques and are well described by QCD predictions.
The production of charm and beauty quarks in ep interactions has been measured with the ZEUS detector at HERA for squared four-momentum exchange Q(2) > 20 GeV(2), using an integrated luminosity of 126 pb(-1). Charm and beauty quarks were identified through their decays into muons. Differential cross sections were measured for muon transverse momenta p(T)(mu) > 1.5 GeV and pseudorapidities - 1.6 < eta(mu) < 2.3, as a function of p(T)(mu), eta(mu), Q(2) and Bjorken x. The charm and beauty contributions to the proton structure function F(2) were also extracted. The results agree with previous measurements based on independent techniques and are well described by QCD predictions.
Measurement of charm and beauty production in deep inelastic ep scattering from decays into muons at HERA
Chekanov S.;Derrick M.;Magill S.;Musgrave B.;Nicholass D.;Repond J.;Yoshida R.;Mattingly M. C. K.;Antonioli P.;Bari G.;Bellagamba L.;Boscherini D.;Bruni A.;Bruni G.;Cindolo F.;Corradi M.;Iacobucci G.;Margotti A.;Nania R.;Polini A.;Antonelli S.;Basile M.;Bindi M.;Cifarelli L.;Contin A.;De Pasquale S.;Sartorelli G.;Zichichi A.;Bartsch D.;Brock I.;Hartmann H.;Hilger E.;Jakob H. P.;Juengst M.;Nuncio Quiroz A. E.;Paul E.;Samson U.;Schoenberg V.;Shehzadi R.;Wlasenko M.;Brook N. H.;Heath G. P.;Morris J. D.;Kaur M.;Kaur P.;Singh I.;CAPUA, Marcella;Fazio S.;MASTROBERARDINO, Anna;Schioppa M.;Susinno G.;TASSI, Enrico;Kim J. Y.;Ibrahim Z. A.;Idris F. Mohamad;Kamaluddin B.;Abdullah W. A. T. Wan;Ning Y.;Ren Z.;Sciulli F.;Chwastowski J.;Eskreys A.;Figiel J.;Galas A.;Olkiewicz K.;Pawlik B.;Stopa P.;Zawiejski L.;Adamczyk L.;Bold T.;Grabowska Bold I.;Kisielewska D.;Lukasik J.;Przybycien M.;Suszycki L.;Kotanski A.;Slominski W.;Behnke O.;Behr J.;Behrens U.;Blohm C.;Borras K.;Bot D.;Ciesielski R.;Coppola N.;Fang S.;Geiser A.;Goettlicher P.;Grebenyuk J.;Gregor I.;Haas T.;Hain W.;Huettmann A.;Januschek F.;Kahle B.;Katkov I. I.;Klein U.;Koetz U.;Kowalski H.;Lisovyi M.;Lobodzinska E.;Loehr B.;Mankel R.;Melzer Pellmann I. A.;Miglioranzi S.;Montanari A.;Namsoo T.;Notz D.;Parenti A.;Roloff P.;Rubinsky I.;Schneekloth U.;Spiridonov A.;Szuba D.;Szuba J.;Theedt T.;Tomaszewska J.;Wolf G.;Wrona K.;Yaguees Molina A. G.;Youngman C.;Zeuner W.;Drugakov V.;Lohmann W.;Schlenstedt S.;Barbagli G.;Gallo E.;Pelfer P. G.;Bamberger A.;Dobur D.;Karstens F.;Vlasov N. N.;Bussey P. J.;Doyle A. T.;Forrest M.;Saxon D. H.;Skillicorn I. O.;Gialas I.;Papageorgiu K.;Holm U.;Klanner R.;Lohrmann E.;Perrey H.;Schleper P.;Schoerner Sadenius T.;Sztuk J.;Stadie H.;Turcato M.;Foudas C.;Fry C.;Long K. R.;Tapper A. D.;Matsumoto T.;Nagano K.;Tokushuku K.;Yamada S.;Yamazaki Y.;Barakbaev A. N.;Boos E. G.;Pokrovskiy N. S.;Zhautykov B. O.;Aushev V.;Bachynska O.;Borodin M.;Kadenko I.;Kuprash O.;Libov V.;Lontkovskyi D.;Makarenko I.;Sorokin I.u.;Verbytskyi A.;Volynets O.;Zolko M.;Son D.;de Favereau J.;Piotrzkowski K.;Barreiro F.;Glasman C.;Jimenez M.;del Peso J.;Ron E.;Terron J.;Uribe Estrada C.;Corriveau F.;Schwartz J.;Zhou C.;Tsurugai T.;Antonov A.;Dolgoshein B. A.;Gladkov D.;Sosnovtsev V.;Stifutkin A.;Suchkov S.;Dementiev R. K.;Ermolov P. F.;Gladilin L. K.;Golubkov Y.u. A.;Khein L. A.;Korzhavina I. A.;Kuzmin V. A.;Levchenko B. B.;Lukina O. Y.u.;Proskuryakov A. S.;Shcheglova L. M.;Zotkin D. S.;Abt I.;Caldwell A.;Kollar D.;Reisert B.;Schmidke W. B.;Grigorescu G.;Keramidas A.;Koffeman E.;Kooijman P.;Pellegrino A.;Tiecke H.;Vazquez M.;Wiggers L.;Bruemmer N.;Bylsma B.;Durkin L. S.;Lee A.;Ling T. Y.;Allfrey P. D.;Bell M. A.;Cooper Sarkar A. M.;Devenish R. C. E.;Ferrando J.;Foster B.;Gwenlan C.;Horton K.;Oliver K.;Robertson A.;Walczak R.;Bertolin A.;Dal Corso F.;Dusini S.;Longhin A.;Stanco L.;Brugnera R.;Carlin R.;Garfagnini A.;Limentani S.;Oh B. Y.;Raval A.;Whitmore J. J.;Iga Y.;D'Agostini G.;Marini G.;Nigro A.;Cole J. E.;Hart J. C.;Abramowicz H.;Ingbir R.;Kananov S.;Levy A.;Stern A.;Kuze M.;Maeda J.;Hori R.;Kagawa S.;Okazaki N.;Shimizu S.;Tawara T.;Hamatsu R.;Kaji H.;Kitamura S.;Ota O.;Ri Y. D.;Costa M.;Ferrero M. I.;Monaco V.;Sacchi R.;Sola V.;Solano A.;Arneodo M.;Ruspa M.;Fourletov S.;Martin J. F.;Stewart T. P.;Boutle S. K.;Butterworth J. M.;Jones T. W.;Loizides J. H.;Wing M.;Brzozowska B.;Ciborowski J.;Grzelak G.;Kulinski P.;Luzniak P.;Malka J.;Nowak R. J.;Pawlak J. M.;Perlanski W.;Zarnecki A. F.;Adamus M.;Plucinski P.;Eisenberg Y.;Hochman D.;Karshon U.;Brownson E.;Reeder D. D.;Savin A. A.;Smith W. H.;Wolfe H.;Bhadra S.;Catterall C. D.;Cui Y.;Hartner G.;Menary S.;Noor U.;Standage J.;Whyte J.
2010-01-01
Abstract
The production of charm and beauty quarks in ep interactions has been measured with the ZEUS detector at HERA for squared four-momentum exchange Q(2) > 20 GeV(2), using an integrated luminosity of 126 pb(-1). Charm and beauty quarks were identified through their decays into muons. Differential cross sections were measured for muon transverse momenta p(T)(mu) > 1.5 GeV and pseudorapidities - 1.6 < eta(mu) < 2.3, as a function of p(T)(mu), eta(mu), Q(2) and Bjorken x. The charm and beauty contributions to the proton structure function F(2) were also extracted. The results agree with previous measurements based on independent techniques and are well described by QCD predictions.
The production of charm and beauty quarks in ep interactions has been measured with the ZEUS detector at HERA for squared four-momentum exchange Q(2) > 20 GeV(2), using an integrated luminosity of 126 pb(-1). Charm and beauty quarks were identified through their decays into muons. Differential cross sections were measured for muon transverse momenta p(T)(mu) > 1.5 GeV and pseudorapidities - 1.6 < eta(mu) < 2.3, as a function of p(T)(mu), eta(mu), Q(2) and Bjorken x. The charm and beauty contributions to the proton structure function F(2) were also extracted. The results agree with previous measurements based on independent techniques and are well described by QCD predictions. RI Doyle, Anthony/C-5889-2009; IBRAHIM, ZAINOL ABIDIN/C-1121-2010; Fazio, Salvatore /G-5156-2010; WAN ABDULLAH, WAN AHMAD TAJUDDIN/B-5439-2010; Ferrando, James/A-9192-2012; Gladilin, Leonid/B-5226-2011
The production of charm and beauty quarks in ep interactions has been measured with the ZEUS detector at HERA for squared four-momentum exchange Q(2) > 20 GeV(2), using an integrated luminosity of 126 pb(-1). Charm and beauty quarks were identified through their decays into muons. Differential cross sections were measured for muon transverse momenta p(T)(mu) > 1.5 GeV and pseudorapidities - 1.6 < eta(mu) < 2.3, as a function of p(T)(mu), eta(mu), Q(2) and Bjorken x. The charm and beauty contributions to the proton structure function F(2) were also extracted. The results agree with previous measurements based on independent techniques and are well described by QCD predictions.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/127012
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
52
44
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.
