What does it mean to be a body marked by the language? Wittgenstein and Lacan have tried to answer this question in the most radical way. A body divided in two by the language is a body always projected beyond the present moment, in the past (regret) or in the future (desire). For this reason, the human body cannot know the present. Wittgenstein and Lacan try to think how to recompose this fracture: the end of the analysis for Lacan, the Mystic for Wittgenstein, are two different ways to indicate a same condition: the space beyond language.

La zecca e l'uomo. Antropologia e linguaggio fra Wittgenstein e Lacan

CIMATTI, Felice
2013-01-01

Abstract

What does it mean to be a body marked by the language? Wittgenstein and Lacan have tried to answer this question in the most radical way. A body divided in two by the language is a body always projected beyond the present moment, in the past (regret) or in the future (desire). For this reason, the human body cannot know the present. Wittgenstein and Lacan try to think how to recompose this fracture: the end of the analysis for Lacan, the Mystic for Wittgenstein, are two different ways to indicate a same condition: the space beyond language.
2013
desire; language; animality
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/136389
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact