The relation of L. J. Prieto (1926-1996) to the Saussurean legacy and the structuralist network particular enough that the word “school” cannot be used to describe it. Prieto’s research was solely guided by constantly straining towards consistency, ignoring mainstream ideas. Notwithstanding, it is possible to sketch the network connecting Prieto to other giants of structuralist semiolinguistic thought, and to draw strong analogies between his theories and other, non-structural, forms of semiotics and philosophy of language (mainly pragmatism and analytical philosophy). The final – and less known – result of Prieto’s studies is cto be found in the volumes of Saggi di semiotica, revealing a comprehensive anthroposemiotic vision, dealing in a genuinely Saussurean fashion with problems often ignored by the mainstream structuralist tradition (e.g. a theory of institutions, which could play a role in the current debate in social ontology).

L. J. Prieto ou de la solitude du penseur

FADDA, EMANUELE
2015-01-01

Abstract

The relation of L. J. Prieto (1926-1996) to the Saussurean legacy and the structuralist network particular enough that the word “school” cannot be used to describe it. Prieto’s research was solely guided by constantly straining towards consistency, ignoring mainstream ideas. Notwithstanding, it is possible to sketch the network connecting Prieto to other giants of structuralist semiolinguistic thought, and to draw strong analogies between his theories and other, non-structural, forms of semiotics and philosophy of language (mainly pragmatism and analytical philosophy). The final – and less known – result of Prieto’s studies is cto be found in the volumes of Saggi di semiotica, revealing a comprehensive anthroposemiotic vision, dealing in a genuinely Saussurean fashion with problems often ignored by the mainstream structuralist tradition (e.g. a theory of institutions, which could play a role in the current debate in social ontology).
2015
L. J. Prieto (1926-1996) avait un rapport caractéristique avec l’héritage saussurien et structuraliste, qui n’était pas conditionné par une adhésion personnelle à une école (pas même par l’amitié avec A. Martinet) – mais seulement par son effort constant de cohérence, indépendamment de toute exigence de confrontation aux autres. Il est néanmoins possible de découvrir des analogies entre les théories priétiennes et d’autres formes, non structuralistes, de sémiotique et de philosophie du langage (principalement le pragmatisme et la philosophie analytique). La pensée de Prieto, arrivée à maturité et telle qu’elle apparaît dans les Saggi di Semiotica, témoigne de cette élaboration personnelle, à la fois pour sa vision anthropo-sémiotique globale et pour la façon dont ce penseur réexamine, dans un cadre saussurien, certains problèmes qui ont été souvent ignorés par la tradition structuraliste (par exemple, la théorie des institutions – ce qui semble être utile par rapport au débat actuel sur l’ontologie sociale).
L. J. Prieto; école de Genève; sémiotique
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/159307
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact