We present the results of an experimental project, made at the University of Calabria, which uses computer simulations and scientific computational systems in teaching and learning the fundamentals of analytic mechanics, in particular the classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation of the matter. Starting with examples of classical dynamical systems we also introduced students to appreciate chaos concepts going step by step to more complex settings. The success obtained with the use of computer-based methodologies has been very clear and the final students’ tests confirm it. In this paper, in particular, we compare the results obtained by four groups of students: the first two attended such an experimental course and employed computer support for their individual work at home, while the learning environment of the second two groups (the control ones) was based only on traditional classroom lectures with paper and pencil home activities. If on the one hand a better overall performance of the first two groups was evident, it is very interesting (and not so easy) to investigate how much in quantity and quality, the learning of the experimental groups differs from that of the other groups, and why. For example, we illustrate some relevant differences between them in the comprehension of the studied phenomena, in dealing with and solving the proposed problems, and also in the individual development of further personal ideas.
The role of computer simulations in learning analytic mechanics towards chaos theory: a course experimentation
Bertacchini, Francesca;Bilotta, Eleonora;Caldarola, Fabio;Pantano, Pietro
2018-01-01
Abstract
We present the results of an experimental project, made at the University of Calabria, which uses computer simulations and scientific computational systems in teaching and learning the fundamentals of analytic mechanics, in particular the classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation of the matter. Starting with examples of classical dynamical systems we also introduced students to appreciate chaos concepts going step by step to more complex settings. The success obtained with the use of computer-based methodologies has been very clear and the final students’ tests confirm it. In this paper, in particular, we compare the results obtained by four groups of students: the first two attended such an experimental course and employed computer support for their individual work at home, while the learning environment of the second two groups (the control ones) was based only on traditional classroom lectures with paper and pencil home activities. If on the one hand a better overall performance of the first two groups was evident, it is very interesting (and not so easy) to investigate how much in quantity and quality, the learning of the experimental groups differs from that of the other groups, and why. For example, we illustrate some relevant differences between them in the comprehension of the studied phenomena, in dealing with and solving the proposed problems, and also in the individual development of further personal ideas.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.