This paper treats Cephalus’ autobiographical account in Ovid’s Metamorphoses 7.690-865, a passage that has given rise to various and even contradictory interpretations. The present analysis takes a broader view of the problem of Cephalus’ credibility by relying on rhetorical concepts such as context and contents of speech. The Ovidian myth of Cephalus and Procris is configured as an epic scene (modeled on the hospitality scenes of the Homeric and Virgilian poems) in which the protagonist recounts his story of love and death to a young male audience. Cephalus’ communicative strategy aims at effecting pathos and veracity. Ovid has operated an innovative selection between existing versions of the myth of Cephalus and Procris (among which the preserved fragment of Pherecydes) in order to construct an authoritative character and an exemplary story.
Cephalus' Autobiographical Narrative ( Metamorphoses 7, 690-865): Between Epic Models and the Conventions of Rhetoric
Alessandra Romeo
2020-01-01
Abstract
This paper treats Cephalus’ autobiographical account in Ovid’s Metamorphoses 7.690-865, a passage that has given rise to various and even contradictory interpretations. The present analysis takes a broader view of the problem of Cephalus’ credibility by relying on rhetorical concepts such as context and contents of speech. The Ovidian myth of Cephalus and Procris is configured as an epic scene (modeled on the hospitality scenes of the Homeric and Virgilian poems) in which the protagonist recounts his story of love and death to a young male audience. Cephalus’ communicative strategy aims at effecting pathos and veracity. Ovid has operated an innovative selection between existing versions of the myth of Cephalus and Procris (among which the preserved fragment of Pherecydes) in order to construct an authoritative character and an exemplary story.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.