In this paper, we tackle the problem of efficiently recomputing the skeptical acceptance of dynamic argumentation frameworks under the well-known preferred semantics. We discuss an incremental algorithmic solution whose main idea is that of exploiting the initial knowledge (including the update to perform) in order to identify a potentially small portion of the argumentation framework. Such a portion is sufficient to compute the skeptical preferred acceptance of a goal argument w.r.t. the whole updated framework. We also discuss on how similar ideas extend to more general argumentation frameworks.

Incremental Skeptical Preferred Acceptance in Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks

Alfano G.;Greco S.
2021-01-01

Abstract

In this paper, we tackle the problem of efficiently recomputing the skeptical acceptance of dynamic argumentation frameworks under the well-known preferred semantics. We discuss an incremental algorithmic solution whose main idea is that of exploiting the initial knowledge (including the update to perform) in order to identify a potentially small portion of the argumentation framework. Such a portion is sufficient to compute the skeptical preferred acceptance of a goal argument w.r.t. the whole updated framework. We also discuss on how similar ideas extend to more general argumentation frameworks.
2021
Artificial Intelligence
Cognition
Computational modeling
Computing Methodologies
Heuristic algorithms
Intelligent systems
Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
Research and development
Semantics
Task analysis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/319724
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact