The thermal performances of building components require an accurate evaluation of the heat transfer processes on the internal and external surfaces. These evaluations involve the convective and the radiative heat transfer coefficients, which in actual conditions vary dynamically. Nevertheless, international standards indicate combined and steady heat transfer coefficients, especially in building energy performance calculations. In this paper, an experimental campaign carried out on a real scale measurement station available at the University of Calabria (Italy), has allowed for comparing the actual data with those calculated by a numerical code based on the Finite Difference Method (FDM), implementing the usual equations governing the heat transfer processes. The code is generalizable for every enclosure and does not require excessive computational effort. By assuming dynamic and separated heat transfer coefficients first, and successively steady and combined values, a comparison in terms of surface temperatures and transmitted thermal fluxes was conducted using the developed code on different building components, having different dispersing and thermal mass features. Regarding the measured values, the provided results showed a large discrepancy when steady and combined heat transfer coefficients are adopted, especially for the inner surfaces. Dynamic and separated heat transfer coefficients, instead, allow for meeting experimental data quite well, independently from dispersing and thermal mass characteristics. Furthermore, in simulation tools, a large discrepancy appears both in terms of energy needs and thermal comfort conditions on the experimental set-up, when simulated with steady convective heat transfer coefficients.

On the assessment of the heat transfer coefficients on building components: A comparison between modeled and experimental data

Bruno R.
Methodology
;
Ferraro V.
Conceptualization
;
Bevilacqua P.
Software
;
Arcuri N.
Formal Analysis
2022-01-01

Abstract

The thermal performances of building components require an accurate evaluation of the heat transfer processes on the internal and external surfaces. These evaluations involve the convective and the radiative heat transfer coefficients, which in actual conditions vary dynamically. Nevertheless, international standards indicate combined and steady heat transfer coefficients, especially in building energy performance calculations. In this paper, an experimental campaign carried out on a real scale measurement station available at the University of Calabria (Italy), has allowed for comparing the actual data with those calculated by a numerical code based on the Finite Difference Method (FDM), implementing the usual equations governing the heat transfer processes. The code is generalizable for every enclosure and does not require excessive computational effort. By assuming dynamic and separated heat transfer coefficients first, and successively steady and combined values, a comparison in terms of surface temperatures and transmitted thermal fluxes was conducted using the developed code on different building components, having different dispersing and thermal mass features. Regarding the measured values, the provided results showed a large discrepancy when steady and combined heat transfer coefficients are adopted, especially for the inner surfaces. Dynamic and separated heat transfer coefficients, instead, allow for meeting experimental data quite well, independently from dispersing and thermal mass characteristics. Furthermore, in simulation tools, a large discrepancy appears both in terms of energy needs and thermal comfort conditions on the experimental set-up, when simulated with steady convective heat transfer coefficients.
2022
Building energy performances
Experimental analysis
Heat transfer coefficients
Theoretical analysis
Thermal comfort
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/332108
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact