CLIMATE CHANGE REGIME AND THE GOVERNMENT OF EMERGENCY. A CONCEPTUAL PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS

In his late writings, Bruno Latour identified a profound mutation of our relationship with the world whose outcomes relapse on the dimension of nature and the * Reception date: 18th February 2023; acceptance date: 26th March 2023. The essay is the issue of a research carried out within the Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche e Sociali, Universita della Calabria and the Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici, Università del Piemonte Orientale. The two authors contributed equally to the research work. However, in order to estimate the academic assessment, the outline of the manuscript is as follows: Filippo Corigliano and Jacopo Marchetti (Sec. 1, 5); Filippo Corigliano (Sec. 2, 3); Jacopo Marchetti (Sec. 4). 92 Soft Power  Volumen 10,1. Enero-Junio, 2023 human species. The problem of the unity of the world that he evoked from the Anthropocene caesura coincides with a vision dominated by technology that leads to a planetary Climate Leviathan that, in other words, represents a previously unknown planned organization of natural phenomena. Our contribution aims at reflecting on the concerns that the New Climate Regime (and its relationship with the political) launches in a world challenged by the climate emergency. It empathizes that the adaptation of the political produce new techniques of the government of the emergency insofar as the demos – a reality constituted by bodies as political subjects– are excluded from crucial decisions which concern the political.