Background: Renal transplant (RTX) recipients seem to experience a better quality of life compared to dialysis patients. However, the factors responsible for this positive effect are not completely defined. Conceivably, a change in the physical performance of these patients could play a role. Methods: To assess this, we measured: (1) waist circumference, fat mass and appendicular fat-free mass (aFFM) by dual-energy X-ray densitometry, (2) physical performance with the Short Physical Performance Battery, and (3) muscle strength with the handgrip test, in 59 male RTX, 11 chronic kidney disease in conservative treatment (CKD) and 10 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Results: Surprisingly, anthropometric characteristics and body composition were similar among the three groups. However, despite a low aFFM, muscle strength was higher in stable RTX recipients > 5 years after transplantation than in dialyzed patients. Instead, CKD (wait-listed for RTX) had similar muscle strength to RTX patients. Waist circumference in RTX recipients showed a redistribution of body fat with increased central adipose tissue allocation compared to PD. At linear regression analysis, age, weight, height, aFFM, hemoglobin and transplant age were independent predictors of handgrip strength, explaining about 37% of the variance. Age and transplant age accounted for 18 and 12% of variance, respectively. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates, for the first time, that clinically stable RTX recipients have greater muscle strength than dialyzed patients and suggests that the handgrip test could be an effective and easy-to-perform tool to assess changes in physical performance in this large patient population.

Assessment of physical performance and body composition in male renal transplant patients

Zaza G;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background: Renal transplant (RTX) recipients seem to experience a better quality of life compared to dialysis patients. However, the factors responsible for this positive effect are not completely defined. Conceivably, a change in the physical performance of these patients could play a role. Methods: To assess this, we measured: (1) waist circumference, fat mass and appendicular fat-free mass (aFFM) by dual-energy X-ray densitometry, (2) physical performance with the Short Physical Performance Battery, and (3) muscle strength with the handgrip test, in 59 male RTX, 11 chronic kidney disease in conservative treatment (CKD) and 10 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Results: Surprisingly, anthropometric characteristics and body composition were similar among the three groups. However, despite a low aFFM, muscle strength was higher in stable RTX recipients > 5 years after transplantation than in dialyzed patients. Instead, CKD (wait-listed for RTX) had similar muscle strength to RTX patients. Waist circumference in RTX recipients showed a redistribution of body fat with increased central adipose tissue allocation compared to PD. At linear regression analysis, age, weight, height, aFFM, hemoglobin and transplant age were independent predictors of handgrip strength, explaining about 37% of the variance. Age and transplant age accounted for 18 and 12% of variance, respectively. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates, for the first time, that clinically stable RTX recipients have greater muscle strength than dialyzed patients and suggests that the handgrip test could be an effective and easy-to-perform tool to assess changes in physical performance in this large patient population.
2018
Body composition
Chronic kidney disease
Handgrip strength
Physical performance
Renal transplantation
Body composition
Chronic kidney disease
Handgrip strength
Physical performance
Renal transplantation
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/365804
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact