Primary refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma is associated with poor outcomes and limited responsiveness to conventional salvage therapies. Although CAR T-cell therapy represents the standard of care in this setting, a substantial proportion of patients cannot receive it despite meeting disease-related criteria. In this review, “unsuitable” refers to patients who are temporarily or functionally unable to undergo CAR T-cell therapy because of reversible clinical conditions, rapidly progressive disease requiring immediate cytoreduction, or logistical and social barriers, rather than permanent contraindications. For these patients, prompt alternative strategies are required. Conventional platinum-based or gemcitabine- and bendamustine-containing regimens retain a role for short-term disease control but offer limited durability. In contrast, novel antibody-based therapies, including polatuzumab-containing combinations, loncastuximab tesirine, and tafasitamab plus lenalidomide, have expanded treatment options with improved tolerability. Most notably, CD20 × CD3 bispecific antibodies represent a major therapeutic advance, providing off-the-shelf immune engagement with predominantly outpatient administration. From a practical perspective, early identification of reversible barriers to CAR T-cell therapy and timely use of bispecific antibodies or other antibody-based regimens are critical to achieve rapid disease control, preserve organ function, and, when feasible, restore eligibility for cellular therapy.

Management of Primary Refractory Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma in Patients Unsuitable for CAR T‐Cell Therapy

Amodio, Nicola;Vigna, Ernesto;Morabito, Fortunato;Gentile, Massimo
2026-01-01

Abstract

Primary refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma is associated with poor outcomes and limited responsiveness to conventional salvage therapies. Although CAR T-cell therapy represents the standard of care in this setting, a substantial proportion of patients cannot receive it despite meeting disease-related criteria. In this review, “unsuitable” refers to patients who are temporarily or functionally unable to undergo CAR T-cell therapy because of reversible clinical conditions, rapidly progressive disease requiring immediate cytoreduction, or logistical and social barriers, rather than permanent contraindications. For these patients, prompt alternative strategies are required. Conventional platinum-based or gemcitabine- and bendamustine-containing regimens retain a role for short-term disease control but offer limited durability. In contrast, novel antibody-based therapies, including polatuzumab-containing combinations, loncastuximab tesirine, and tafasitamab plus lenalidomide, have expanded treatment options with improved tolerability. Most notably, CD20 × CD3 bispecific antibodies represent a major therapeutic advance, providing off-the-shelf immune engagement with predominantly outpatient administration. From a practical perspective, early identification of reversible barriers to CAR T-cell therapy and timely use of bispecific antibodies or other antibody-based regimens are critical to achieve rapid disease control, preserve organ function, and, when feasible, restore eligibility for cellular therapy.
2026
DLBCL
CAR T‐cell therapy
CAR T‐cell unsuitability
antibody–drug conjugates
bispecific antibodies
disease progression
primary refractory DLBCL
salvage therapy
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/401218
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact