The aim of this work is analysing the different perceptions among groups of users on transitservice quality. We propose a methodology based on a classification and regression treeapproach (CART) allowing the characteristics mostly influencing overall service quality to beidentified. The methodology is applied by using data regarding a rail service of the NorthernItaly, particularly suburban lines connecting different towns of the hinterland of the city ofMilan. Passengers expressed their opinions about service characteristics such as safety,cleanliness, comfort, information, personnel. We found that perceptions about service quality aredifferentiated among the various groups of users.

Heterogeneity in perceptions of service quality among groups of railway passengers

EBOLI, Laura
;
MAZZULLA, GABRIELLA
2015-01-01

Abstract

The aim of this work is analysing the different perceptions among groups of users on transitservice quality. We propose a methodology based on a classification and regression treeapproach (CART) allowing the characteristics mostly influencing overall service quality to beidentified. The methodology is applied by using data regarding a rail service of the NorthernItaly, particularly suburban lines connecting different towns of the hinterland of the city ofMilan. Passengers expressed their opinions about service characteristics such as safety,cleanliness, comfort, information, personnel. We found that perceptions about service quality aredifferentiated among the various groups of users.
2015
rail transport; service quality; CART methodology
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/135433
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 104
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 88
social impact