The effects of interfacial layer quality on the low-frequency noise behavior of p-channel MOSFETs with high-kappa gate dielectric and metal gate are investigated. Devices with chemically grown SiO2 interfacial layers (0.8 nm) are compared with Nz0 (0.8 am) interfacial oxides. A 0.4 nm SiO2 interfacial layer device is used for comparison purposes. A cross-over kind of behavior has been observed in NZO devices, which occur at lower gate voltages (-1.2-1.3 V) when normalized spectral densities and input referred noise are investigated. This behavior is found to be closely related to the observed transconductance variation in these devices. The dominant mechanism of 1/f noise is found to be Hooge's mobility fluctuations. Hooge's parameter, as a figure of merit, shows an increase for 0.4 am devices when compared to 0.8 nm devices, while 0.8 nm NO devices confirm their cross-over nature.

The effects of interfacial layer quality on the low-frequency noise behavior of p-channel MOSFETs with high-kappa gate dielectric and metal gate are investigated. Devices with chemically grown SiO2 interfacial layers (0.8 nm) are compared with Nz0 (0.8 am) interfacial oxides. A 0.4 nm SiO2 interfacial layer device is used for comparison purposes. A cross-over kind of behavior has been observed in NZO devices, which occur at lower gate voltages (-1.2-1.3 V) when normalized spectral densities and input referred noise are investigated. This behavior is found to be closely related to the observed transconductance variation in these devices. The dominant mechanism of 1/f noise is found to be Hooge's mobility fluctuations. Hooge's parameter, as a figure of merit, shows an increase for 0.4 am devices when compared to 0.8 nm devices, while 0.8 nm NO devices confirm their cross-over nature. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Interfacial layer quality effects on low-frequency noise (1/f) in p-MOSFETs with advanced gate stacks

CRUPI, Felice;PACE, Calogero;
2007-01-01

Abstract

The effects of interfacial layer quality on the low-frequency noise behavior of p-channel MOSFETs with high-kappa gate dielectric and metal gate are investigated. Devices with chemically grown SiO2 interfacial layers (0.8 nm) are compared with Nz0 (0.8 am) interfacial oxides. A 0.4 nm SiO2 interfacial layer device is used for comparison purposes. A cross-over kind of behavior has been observed in NZO devices, which occur at lower gate voltages (-1.2-1.3 V) when normalized spectral densities and input referred noise are investigated. This behavior is found to be closely related to the observed transconductance variation in these devices. The dominant mechanism of 1/f noise is found to be Hooge's mobility fluctuations. Hooge's parameter, as a figure of merit, shows an increase for 0.4 am devices when compared to 0.8 nm devices, while 0.8 nm NO devices confirm their cross-over nature.
2007
The effects of interfacial layer quality on the low-frequency noise behavior of p-channel MOSFETs with high-kappa gate dielectric and metal gate are investigated. Devices with chemically grown SiO2 interfacial layers (0.8 nm) are compared with Nz0 (0.8 am) interfacial oxides. A 0.4 nm SiO2 interfacial layer device is used for comparison purposes. A cross-over kind of behavior has been observed in NZO devices, which occur at lower gate voltages (-1.2-1.3 V) when normalized spectral densities and input referred noise are investigated. This behavior is found to be closely related to the observed transconductance variation in these devices. The dominant mechanism of 1/f noise is found to be Hooge's mobility fluctuations. Hooge's parameter, as a figure of merit, shows an increase for 0.4 am devices when compared to 0.8 nm devices, while 0.8 nm NO devices confirm their cross-over nature. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/143847
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact