A multilevel fuzzy synthetic evaluation model to evaluate the railway service quality is proposed based on the fuzzy theory. Anevaluation indicator system with three grades evaluation indicators is established, and their weights are determined on the basisof opinions expressed by interviewed passengers. Railway service quality is evaluated by the value of a comprehensivesatisfaction degree. The method can provide not only for the passengers’ overall satisfaction degree on the railway service quality,but also the passengers’ satisfaction degree on some primary evaluation indicators. According to the evaluation results, we foundinteresting differences of perception of the service among the users.

Multilevel comprehensive evaluation of the railway service quality

EBOLI, Laura
;
MAZZULLA, GABRIELLA
2016-01-01

Abstract

A multilevel fuzzy synthetic evaluation model to evaluate the railway service quality is proposed based on the fuzzy theory. Anevaluation indicator system with three grades evaluation indicators is established, and their weights are determined on the basisof opinions expressed by interviewed passengers. Railway service quality is evaluated by the value of a comprehensivesatisfaction degree. The method can provide not only for the passengers’ overall satisfaction degree on the railway service quality,but also the passengers’ satisfaction degree on some primary evaluation indicators. According to the evaluation results, we foundinteresting differences of perception of the service among the users.
2016
railway; service quality; multilevel fuzzy evaluation
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/155829
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact