Tertiary-level English medium instruction (EMI) presents an opportunity for both EMI and science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) pedagogies: tertiary STEM needs student-centred strategies familiar to EFL, whereas tertiary EFL can harness the innate complexity of STEM towards complex language production. With the aim of achieving coequal EFL–STEM collaborations, this article presents: (1) neuroscience findings demonstrating the shortcomings of teacher-centred lecturing common in tertiary STEM instruction, and thus the need for EFL expertise; (2) a schema which, by logically delineating the ‘language dilemma of content instruction’, positions language instruction within STEM education; (3) two grids for guiding instructional design—a two-dimensional grid that disentangles content from language, delineating the cognitive demands imposed by each and helping experts optimize the trajectory of instructional-tasks, and a three-dimensional translanguaging grid delineating all linguistic codes within the EMI space, allowing each EFL–STEM team member to participate in designing student-centred translanguaging tasks without leaving their respective comfort zones; (4) examples of EMI–STEM translanguaging tasks informed by the grids and which guarantee level-appropriate content instruction while supporting the mastery of disciplinary discourses, in both English and the L1.

Tertiary-level STEM and EMI: where EFL and content meet to potentiate each other

Yen-Ling Ting
2022-01-01

Abstract

Tertiary-level English medium instruction (EMI) presents an opportunity for both EMI and science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) pedagogies: tertiary STEM needs student-centred strategies familiar to EFL, whereas tertiary EFL can harness the innate complexity of STEM towards complex language production. With the aim of achieving coequal EFL–STEM collaborations, this article presents: (1) neuroscience findings demonstrating the shortcomings of teacher-centred lecturing common in tertiary STEM instruction, and thus the need for EFL expertise; (2) a schema which, by logically delineating the ‘language dilemma of content instruction’, positions language instruction within STEM education; (3) two grids for guiding instructional design—a two-dimensional grid that disentangles content from language, delineating the cognitive demands imposed by each and helping experts optimize the trajectory of instructional-tasks, and a three-dimensional translanguaging grid delineating all linguistic codes within the EMI space, allowing each EFL–STEM team member to participate in designing student-centred translanguaging tasks without leaving their respective comfort zones; (4) examples of EMI–STEM translanguaging tasks informed by the grids and which guarantee level-appropriate content instruction while supporting the mastery of disciplinary discourses, in both English and the L1.
2022
English Medium Instruction (EMI), STEM, Tertiary, Materials Design
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11770/336205
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact