The recovery of lithium from extracts obtained from a black mass of spent lithium-ion batteries treated with a ternary solvent system at acidic pH was investigated using flat-sheet nanofiltration (NF) membranes operated according to a dead-end configuration. Specifically, four samples obtained at different pH values (2.5 and 5) and extraction times (48, 96 and 168 h) were treated in selected operating conditions by using two commercial polymeric membranes (denoted DK and HL, with an approximate molecular weight cut-off of 150–300 Da) up to a volume reduction factor (VRF) of 4. Membrane performance was assessed in terms of productivity and selectivity towards specific ions, including lithium. For most treated samples, the HL membrane exhibited higher permeate fluxes in comparison to the DK membrane. However, the DK membrane performed better in terms of lithium rejection than the HL membrane, with a negative rejection at VRF 4 observed for all treated samples. More than 90% of multivalent ions were rejected by both membranes independently of the VRF. The membrane ability to retain multivalent ions led to their progressive concentration in the retentate as the VRF increased. The extraction time did not impact the NF performance of both membranes in terms of ion rejection. For the DK membrane conditions of extraction of 96 h and pH 5 represented the best trade-off between flux, ion rejection, and total lithium recovery.
Enhancement in Lithium Recovery from Spent Lithium Batteries by Nanofiltration Membranes
Prenesti, Giuseppe;Tagarelli, Antonio;Elliani, Rosangela;Napoli, Anna;Caravella, Alessio;Tocci, Elena;Cappuccino, Gregorio;
2025-01-01
Abstract
The recovery of lithium from extracts obtained from a black mass of spent lithium-ion batteries treated with a ternary solvent system at acidic pH was investigated using flat-sheet nanofiltration (NF) membranes operated according to a dead-end configuration. Specifically, four samples obtained at different pH values (2.5 and 5) and extraction times (48, 96 and 168 h) were treated in selected operating conditions by using two commercial polymeric membranes (denoted DK and HL, with an approximate molecular weight cut-off of 150–300 Da) up to a volume reduction factor (VRF) of 4. Membrane performance was assessed in terms of productivity and selectivity towards specific ions, including lithium. For most treated samples, the HL membrane exhibited higher permeate fluxes in comparison to the DK membrane. However, the DK membrane performed better in terms of lithium rejection than the HL membrane, with a negative rejection at VRF 4 observed for all treated samples. More than 90% of multivalent ions were rejected by both membranes independently of the VRF. The membrane ability to retain multivalent ions led to their progressive concentration in the retentate as the VRF increased. The extraction time did not impact the NF performance of both membranes in terms of ion rejection. For the DK membrane conditions of extraction of 96 h and pH 5 represented the best trade-off between flux, ion rejection, and total lithium recovery.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


